GLM-5 (Reasoning) vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct

GLM-5 (Reasoning) vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
40.60
Total cost
-
MicrosoftPhi-4 Mini InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5 (Reasoning)Phi-4 Mini InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)40.65.7−86.0% Phi-4 Mini Instruct is 86.0% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)80.34s12.32s−84.7% Phi-4 Mini Instruct is 84.7% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.00 / $3.20$0.00 / $0.00
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5 (Reasoning): what beats itPhi-4 Mini Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5/phi-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5/phi-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill