GPT-4.1 mini vs HyperNova 60B 2605
Which is better for the money: GPT-4.1 mini by OpenAI or HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick HyperNova 60B 2605
HyperNova 60B 2605 vs GPT-4.1 mini: 20.3% more intelligence, 53.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 8.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-4.1 mini | HyperNova 60B 2605 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.8 | 17.8 | +20.3% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 20.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $74.67 | $35.05 | −53.1% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 53.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.65s | 8.32s | +8.8% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 8.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $1.60 | $0.04 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-4.1 mini is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) scores 40.30 for $74.3.
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 37.20 for $25.2.
GPT-4.1 miniHyperNova 60B 2605Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-mini/hypernova-60b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-mini/hypernova-60b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill