GPT-4.1 mini vs HyperNova 60B 2605
Which is better for the money: GPT-4.1 mini by OpenAI or HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick HyperNova 60B 2605
HyperNova 60B 2605 vs GPT-4.1 mini: 23.6% more intelligence, 41.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 14.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-4.1 mini | HyperNova 60B 2605 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.8 | 18.3 | +23.6% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 23.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $64.23 | $37.50 | −41.6% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 41.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.10s | 6.93s | −14.4% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 14.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $1.60 | $0.04 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-4.1 mini is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (high) scores 47.00 for $55.0.
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.1.
GPT-4.1 miniHyperNova 60B 2605Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-mini/hypernova-60b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-mini/hypernova-60b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill