GPT-4.1 mini vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GPT-4.1 mini by OpenAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 28.2 points higher (43.0 vs 14.8) but costs 8.5× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $64.2; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 14.8, and GPT-4.1 mini when 14.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-4.1 mini | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.8 | 43.0 | +190.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 2.9× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $64.23 | $544.58 | +747.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 8.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.10s | 66.82s | +724.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 724.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $1.60 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT-4.1 mini: 190.5% more intelligence, 747.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 724.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-4.1 mini is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (high) scores 47.00 for $55.0.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
GPT-4.1 miniKimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-mini/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-4-1-mini/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill