GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) vs MiniMax-M2.1

GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) vs MiniMax-M2.1. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
40.10
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.1Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
31.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh)MiniMax-M2.1Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)40.131.4−21.7% MiniMax-M2.1 is 21.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)65.20s31.61s−51.5% MiniMax-M2.1 is 51.5% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.75 / $14.0$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh): what beats itMiniMax-M2.1: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2-codex/minimax-m2-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-2-codex/minimax-m2-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill