GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh): 52.4% less intelligence, 43.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.2% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.2 | 10.1 | −52.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 52.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $476.03 | +43.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 43.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 70.45s | 5.52s | −92.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 92.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill