GPT-5.4 (xhigh) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 (xhigh) by OpenAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-01.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) scores 10.1 points higher (53.1 vs 43.0) but costs 4.0× as much to run the benchmark ($2201 vs $545; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.4 (xhigh) when you need intelligence above 43.0, and Kimi K2.7 Code when 43.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 (xhigh) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.1 | 43.0 | −19.0% Kimi K2.7 Code is 19.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,200.98 | $544.58 | −75.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 75.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 103.63s | 60.38s | −41.7% Kimi K2.7 Code is 41.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.50 / $15.0 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT-5.4 (xhigh): 19.0% less intelligence, 75.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 41.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 (xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort) scores 61.50 for $1974.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 57.50 for $138.
GPT-5.4 (xhigh)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill