GPT-5.4 (xhigh) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 (xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) scores 31.8 points higher (53.1 vs 21.3) but costs 8.7× as much to run the benchmark ($2183 vs $250; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.4 (xhigh) when you need intelligence above 21.3, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 21.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 (xhigh) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.1 | 21.3 | −59.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 59.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,182.79 | $250.18 | −88.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 88.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 147.91s | 4.97s | −96.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 96.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.50 / $15.0 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.4 (xhigh): 59.9% less intelligence, 88.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 96.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 (xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort) scores 61.50 for $1974.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
GPT-5.4 (xhigh)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill