GPT-5.5 (low) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (low) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (low) scores 23.2 points higher (44.5 vs 21.3) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($374 vs $250; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-5.5 (low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (low) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.5 | 21.3 | −52.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 52.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $374.45 | $250.18 | −33.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 33.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.41s | 5.28s | −49.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 49.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.5 (low): 52.1% less intelligence, 33.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
GPT-5.5 (low)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-low/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-low/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill