GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) vs HyperNova 60B 2605
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) scores 17.6 points higher (35.4 vs 17.8) but costs 6.0× as much to run the benchmark ($211 vs $35.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 17.8, and HyperNova 60B 2605 when 17.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) | HyperNova 60B 2605 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.4 | 17.8 | −49.7% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 49.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $211.11 | $35.05 | −83.4% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 83.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.04s | 8.32s | −8.0% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 8.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.04 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
HyperNova 60B 2605 vs GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning): 49.7% less intelligence, 83.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 8.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiniMax-M3 scores 44.40 for $204.
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 37.20 for $25.2.
GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)HyperNova 60B 2605Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-non-reasoning/hypernova-60b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-non-reasoning/hypernova-60b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill