GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) vs HyperNova 60B 2605
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) scores 17.5 points higher (35.8 vs 18.3) but costs 5.6× as much to run the benchmark ($212 vs $37.5; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 18.3, and HyperNova 60B 2605 when 18.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) | HyperNova 60B 2605 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.8 | 18.3 | −48.9% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 48.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $211.75 | $37.50 | −82.3% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 82.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.73s | 6.93s | −28.8% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 28.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.04 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
HyperNova 60B 2605 vs GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning): 48.9% less intelligence, 82.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 28.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.1.
GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)HyperNova 60B 2605Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-non-reasoning/hypernova-60b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-non-reasoning/hypernova-60b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill