GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning): 40.5% less intelligence, 18.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 45.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.8 | 21.3 | −40.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 40.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $211.75 | $250.18 | +18.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 18.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.73s | 5.28s | −45.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 45.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-non-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-non-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill