GPT-5.6 Sol (low) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (low) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (low) scores 23.7 points higher (33.8 vs 10.1) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($637 vs $476; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-5.6 Sol (low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (low) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.8 | 10.1 | −70.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 70.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $637.28 | $476.03 | −25.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 25.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.13s | 5.52s | −45.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 45.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.6 Sol (low): 70.1% less intelligence, 25.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 45.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
GPT-5.6 Sol (low)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill