GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) by OpenAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) scores 28.6 points higher (39.5 vs 10.9) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($997 vs $518; both premium class). Pick GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 10.9 | −72.4% Trinity Large Thinking is 72.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $997.39 | $518.07 | −48.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 48.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.77s | 8.78s | −31.2% Trinity Large Thinking is 31.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Trinity Large Thinking vs GPT-5.6 Sol (medium): 72.4% less intelligence, 48.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 31.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
GPT-5.6 Sol (medium)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-medium/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-medium/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill