GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs HyperNova 60B 2605
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning) scores 23.4 points higher (41.2 vs 17.8) but costs 6.9× as much to run the benchmark ($242 vs $35.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 17.8, and HyperNova 60B 2605 when 17.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | HyperNova 60B 2605 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 17.8 | −56.8% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 56.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $241.51 | $35.05 | −85.5% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 85.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.12s | 8.32s | −25.2% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 25.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.04 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
HyperNova 60B 2605 vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 56.8% less intelligence, 85.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 25.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 37.20 for $25.2.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning)HyperNova 60B 2605Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-non-reasoning/hypernova-60b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-non-reasoning/hypernova-60b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill