GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 1.1 points higher (43.0 vs 41.9) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $240; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.9 | 43.0 | +2.6% Kimi K2.7 Code is 2.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $239.66 | $544.58 | +127.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.40s | 66.82s | +610.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 610.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 2.6% more intelligence, 127.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 610.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-non-reasoning/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-non-reasoning/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill