GPT-5.6 Sol (max) vs HyperNova 60B 2605
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (max) by OpenAI or HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) scores 42.6 points higher (60.9 vs 18.3) but costs 75× as much to run the benchmark ($2823 vs $37.5; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Sol (max) when you need intelligence above 18.3, and HyperNova 60B 2605 when 18.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (max) | HyperNova 60B 2605 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 60.9 | 18.3 | −70.0% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 70.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,823.25 | $37.50 | −98.7% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 98.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 153.58s | 6.93s | −95.5% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 95.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.04 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
HyperNova 60B 2605 vs GPT-5.6 Sol (max): 70.0% less intelligence, 98.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 95.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort) scores 61.50 for $1974.
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.1.
GPT-5.6 Sol (max)HyperNova 60B 2605Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol/hypernova-60b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol/hypernova-60b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill