GPT-5 mini (high) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-5 mini (high) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5 mini (high)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5 mini (high): 17.4% less intelligence, 91.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 94.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5 mini (high) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 21.3 | −17.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 17.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $130.34 | $250.18 | +91.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 91.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 95.37s | 4.97s | −94.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 94.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $2.00 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5 mini (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 50.10 for $95.1.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
GPT-5 mini (high)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill