GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-12.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium): 80.8% less intelligence, 83.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.2% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.8 | 9.2 | −80.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 80.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $361.37 | $662.85 | +83.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 83.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.17s | 8.20s | −52.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 52.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.50 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-medium/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-medium/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill