Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs HyperNova 60B 2605
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI or HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) scores 7.0 points higher (24.8 vs 17.8) but costs 5.7× as much to run the benchmark ($201 vs $35.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 17.8, and HyperNova 60B 2605 when 17.8 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | HyperNova 60B 2605 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.8 | 17.8 | −28.2% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 28.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $200.76 | $35.05 | −82.5% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 82.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.58s | 8.32s | +49.1% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 49.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.04 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
HyperNova 60B 2605 vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning): 28.2% less intelligence, 82.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) scores 44.30 for $176.
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 37.20 for $25.2.
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)HyperNova 60B 2605Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/hypernova-60b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/hypernova-60b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill