Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-01.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning): 14.8% less intelligence, 24.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 20.2% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.0 | 21.3 | −14.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 14.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $200.93 | $250.18 | +24.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 24.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.63s | 4.49s | −20.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 20.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 57.50 for $138.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 57.50 for $138.
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill