Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning): 30.3% less intelligence, 134.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 22.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.5 | 10.1 | −30.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 30.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $203.06 | $476.03 | +134.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.49s | 5.52s | +22.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 22.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 34.80 for $179.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3-non-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill