Grok 4.5 (high) vs HyperNova 60B 2605
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.5 (high) by SpaceXAI or HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.5 (high) scores 37.5 points higher (55.8 vs 18.3) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($579 vs $37.5; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.5 (high) when you need intelligence above 18.3, and HyperNova 60B 2605 when 18.3 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.5 (high) | HyperNova 60B 2605 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.8 | 18.3 | −67.2% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 67.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $579.21 | $37.50 | −93.5% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 93.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.07s | 6.93s | −59.4% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 59.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.04 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
HyperNova 60B 2605 vs Grok 4.5 (high): 67.2% less intelligence, 93.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.5 (high) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.1.
Grok 4.5 (high)HyperNova 60B 2605Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-5/hypernova-60b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-5/hypernova-60b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill