Grok 4.6 (low) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (low) by SpaceXAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (low) scores 24.5 points higher (35.4 vs 10.9) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($761 vs $518; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.6 (low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (low) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.4 | 10.9 | −69.2% Trinity Large Thinking is 69.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $760.75 | $518.07 | −31.9% Trinity Large Thinking is 31.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.16s | 8.78s | −42.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 42.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Grok 4.6 (low): 69.2% less intelligence, 31.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 42.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Grok 4.6 (low)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill