Grok 4.6 (medium) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (medium) by SpaceXAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (medium) scores 16.7 points higher (43.0 vs 26.3) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1937 vs $993; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.6 (medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (medium) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.0 | 26.3 | −38.8% Kimi K2.7 Code is 38.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,936.75 | $992.88 | −48.7% Kimi K2.7 Code is 48.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 39.69s | 41.22s | +3.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 3.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Grok 4.6 (medium): 38.8% less intelligence, 48.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 3.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (low) scores 46.00 for $1537.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Grok 4.6 (medium)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-medium/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-medium/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill