Grok 4.6 (medium) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (medium) by SpaceXAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (medium) scores 32.1 points higher (43.0 vs 10.9) but costs 3.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1937 vs $518; both premium class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (medium) when you need intelligence above 10.9, and Trinity Large Thinking when 10.9 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (medium) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.0 | 10.9 | −74.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 74.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,936.75 | $518.07 | −73.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 73.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 39.69s | 8.78s | −77.9% Trinity Large Thinking is 77.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Grok 4.6 (medium): 74.7% less intelligence, 73.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 77.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (low) scores 46.00 for $1537.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Grok 4.6 (medium)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-medium/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-medium/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill