Hy3 vs HyperNova 60B 2605
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Hy3 scores 23.9 points higher (42.2 vs 18.3) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($93.6 vs $37.5; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick Hy3 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise HyperNova 60B 2605.
| Metric | Hy3 | HyperNova 60B 2605 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.2 | 18.3 | −56.6% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 56.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $93.60 | $37.50 | −59.9% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 59.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 40.58s | 6.93s | −82.9% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 82.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.56 | $0.04 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
HyperNova 60B 2605 vs Hy3: 56.6% less intelligence, 59.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) scores 51.80 for $72.0.
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.1.
Hy3HyperNova 60B 2605Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/hypernova-60b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/hypernova-60b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill