Hy3 vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 0.5 points higher (26.3 vs 25.8) but costs 6.6× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $149; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 25.8, and Hy3 when 25.8 is enough.
| Metric | Hy3 | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 26.3 | +1.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 1.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.44 | $992.88 | +564.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 6.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.10s | 41.22s | +41.6% Kimi K2.7 Code is 41.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.55 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Hy3: 1.9% more intelligence, 564.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 41.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores 26.40 for $138.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Hy3Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill