Hy3 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Hy3
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Hy3: 60.9% less intelligence, 218.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.0% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Hy3 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 10.1 | −60.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 60.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.44 | $476.03 | +218.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 3.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.10s | 5.52s | −81.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 81.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.55 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores 26.40 for $138.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Hy3Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill