HyperNova 60B 2605 vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 vs HyperNova 60B 2605: 107.7% more intelligence, 32.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 312.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | HyperNova 60B 2605 | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.3 | 38.0 | +107.7% MiMo-V2.5 is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $37.50 | $25.18 | −32.9% MiMo-V2.5 is 32.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.93s | 28.60s | +312.7% MiMo-V2.5 is 312.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.04 / $0.14 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.1.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.1.
HyperNova 60B 2605MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hypernova-60b/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hypernova-60b/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill