HyperNova 60B 2605 vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3 scores 26.6 points higher (44.4 vs 17.8) but costs 5.8× as much to run the benchmark ($204 vs $35.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiniMax-M3 when you need intelligence above 17.8, and HyperNova 60B 2605 when 17.8 is enough.
| Metric | HyperNova 60B 2605 | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 17.8 | 44.4 | +149.4% MiniMax-M3 is 2.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $35.05 | $203.86 | +481.6% MiniMax-M3 is 5.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.32s | 31.89s | +283.3% MiniMax-M3 is 283.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.04 / $0.14 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
MiniMax-M3 vs HyperNova 60B 2605: 149.4% more intelligence, 481.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 283.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 37.20 for $25.2.
- MiniMax-M3 is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
HyperNova 60B 2605MiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hypernova-60b/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hypernova-60b/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill