HyperNova 60B 2605 vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3 scores 27.1 points higher (45.4 vs 18.3) but costs 5.5× as much to run the benchmark ($205 vs $37.5; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiniMax-M3 when you need intelligence above 18.3, and HyperNova 60B 2605 when 18.3 is enough.
| Metric | HyperNova 60B 2605 | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.3 | 45.4 | +148.1% MiniMax-M3 is 2.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $37.50 | $204.82 | +446.2% MiniMax-M3 is 5.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.93s | 27.32s | +294.2% MiniMax-M3 is 294.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.04 / $0.14 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
MiniMax-M3 vs HyperNova 60B 2605: 148.1% more intelligence, 446.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 294.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.1.
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
HyperNova 60B 2605MiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hypernova-60b/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hypernova-60b/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill