HyperNova 60B 2605 vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick HyperNova 60B 2605
Solar Pro 3 vs HyperNova 60B 2605: 20.8% less intelligence, 321.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 207.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | HyperNova 60B 2605 | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.3 | 14.5 | −20.8% Solar Pro 3 is 20.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $37.50 | $158.07 | +321.5% Solar Pro 3 is 4.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.93s | 21.31s | +207.5% Solar Pro 3 is 207.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.04 / $0.14 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.1.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) scores 51.80 for $72.0.
HyperNova 60B 2605Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hypernova-60b/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hypernova-60b/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill