HyperNova 60B 2605 vs Solar Pro 4
Which is better for the money: HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing or Solar Pro 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-01.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Pro 4 scores 23.3 points higher (41.6 vs 18.3) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($380 vs $37.5; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Solar Pro 4 when you need intelligence above 18.3, and HyperNova 60B 2605 when 18.3 is enough.
| Metric | HyperNova 60B 2605 | Solar Pro 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.3 | 41.6 | +127.3% Solar Pro 4 is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $37.50 | $380.17 | +913.8% Solar Pro 4 is 10× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.15s | 30.90s | +279.1% Solar Pro 4 is 279.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.04 / $0.14 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Solar Pro 4 vs HyperNova 60B 2605: 127.3% more intelligence, 913.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 279.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.5.
- Solar Pro 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 57.50 for $138.
HyperNova 60B 2605Solar Pro 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hypernova-60b/solar-pro4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hypernova-60b/solar-pro4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill