Inkling (xhigh) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Inkling (xhigh) by Thinking Machines or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-22.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Kimi K2.7 Code
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Inkling (xhigh): 3.2% more intelligence, 3.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 72.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Inkling (xhigh) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.0 | 25.8 | +3.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 3.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,026.14 | $992.88 | −3.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 3.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.45s | 47.33s | +72.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 72.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $4.05 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling (xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Inkling (xhigh)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill