Kimi K2.7 Code vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 0.4% more intelligence, 86.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 76.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.3 | 26.4 | +0.4% MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 0.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $138.26 | −86.1% MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 86.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 41.22s | 72.58s | +76.1% MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 76.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMiMo-V2.5-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill