Kimi K2.7 Code vs MiniMax-M2.7
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or MiniMax-M2.7 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 4.1 points higher (43.0 vs 38.9) but costs 3.8× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $143; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 38.9, and MiniMax-M2.7 when 38.9 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiniMax-M2.7 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.0 | 38.9 | −9.5% MiniMax-M2.7 is 9.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.58 | $142.70 | −73.8% MiniMax-M2.7 is 73.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 73.20s | 45.88s | −37.3% MiniMax-M2.7 is 37.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
MiniMax-M2.7 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 9.5% less intelligence, 73.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 37.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) scores 56.00 for $485.
- MiniMax-M2.7 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 50.10 for $95.1.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMiniMax-M2.7Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/minimax-m2-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/minimax-m2-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill