Kimi K2.7 Code vs MiniMax-M2.7
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or MiniMax-M2.7 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-22.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 3.0 points higher (25.8 vs 22.8) but costs 4.2× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $236; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 22.8, and MiniMax-M2.7 when 22.8 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiniMax-M2.7 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 22.8 | −11.6% MiniMax-M2.7 is 11.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $235.96 | −76.2% MiniMax-M2.7 is 76.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.33s | 38.58s | −18.5% MiniMax-M2.7 is 18.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
MiniMax-M2.7 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 11.6% less intelligence, 76.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 18.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- MiniMax-M2.7 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMiniMax-M2.7Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/minimax-m2-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/minimax-m2-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill