Kimi K2.7 Code vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3
MiniMax-M3 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 5.6% more intelligence, 62.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.0 | 45.4 | +5.6% MiniMax-M3 is 5.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.58 | $204.82 | −62.4% MiniMax-M3 is 62.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 66.82s | 27.32s | −59.1% MiniMax-M3 is 59.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill