Kimi K2.7 Code vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Mistral Medium 3.1 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 28.3 points higher (43.0 vs 14.7) but costs 4.1× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $134; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 14.7, and Mistral Medium 3.1 when 14.7 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.0 | 14.7 | −65.8% Mistral Medium 3.1 is 65.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.58 | $133.77 | −75.4% Mistral Medium 3.1 is 75.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 75.91s | 6.17s | −91.9% Mistral Medium 3.1 is 91.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.40 / $2.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 65.8% less intelligence, 75.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) scores 56.00 for $485.
- Mistral Medium 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 50.10 for $95.1.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMistral Medium 3.1Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/mistral-medium-3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/mistral-medium-3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill