Kimi K2.7 Code vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Kimi K2.7 Code
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 43.3% less intelligence, 16.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.3 | 14.9 | −43.3% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 43.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $1,159.93 | +16.8% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 16.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 41.22s | 19.22s | −53.4% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 53.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill