Kimi K2.7 Code vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 19.3 points higher (26.3 vs 7.0) but costs 6.1× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $163; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 7.0, and Mistral Small 3.2 when 7.0 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.3 | 7.0 | −73.4% Mistral Small 3.2 is 73.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $162.68 | −83.6% Mistral Small 3.2 is 83.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 41.22s | 3.90s | −90.5% Mistral Small 3.2 is 90.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.10 / $0.30 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Mistral Small 3.2 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 73.4% less intelligence, 83.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores 26.40 for $138.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill