Kimi K2.7 Code vs Muse Glimmer (high)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Muse Glimmer (high) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 7.9 points higher (43.0 vs 35.1) but costs 5.2× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $105; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 35.1, and Muse Glimmer (high) when 35.1 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer (high) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.0 | 35.1 | −18.4% Muse Glimmer (high) is 18.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.58 | $105.03 | −80.7% Muse Glimmer (high) is 80.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 75.91s | 23.35s | −69.2% Muse Glimmer (high) is 69.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.32 / $1.35 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Muse Glimmer (high) vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 18.4% less intelligence, 80.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 69.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) scores 56.00 for $485.
- Muse Glimmer (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 50.10 for $95.1.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMuse Glimmer (high)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill