Kimi K2.7 Code vs Muse Glimmer (high)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Muse Glimmer (high) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 8.2 points higher (26.3 vs 18.1) but costs 6.5× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $152; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 18.1, and Muse Glimmer (high) when 18.1 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer (high) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.3 | 18.1 | −31.2% Muse Glimmer (high) is 31.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $151.68 | −84.7% Muse Glimmer (high) is 84.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 41.22s | 24.94s | −39.5% Muse Glimmer (high) is 39.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.35 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Muse Glimmer (high) vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 31.2% less intelligence, 84.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 39.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Muse Glimmer (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores 26.40 for $138.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMuse Glimmer (high)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill