Kimi K2.7 Code vs Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) scores 8.0 points higher (34.3 vs 26.3) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1737 vs $993; both premium class). Pick Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.3 | 34.3 | +30.4% Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) is 30.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $1,737.18 | +75.0% Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) is 75.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 41.22s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 30.4% more intelligence, 75.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (low) scores 46.00 for $1537.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMuse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill