Kimi K2.7 Code vs Quasar 438B (max, based on GLM-5.2)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Quasar 438B (max, based on GLM-5.2) by Multiverse Computing? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Quasar 438B (max, based on GLM-5.2) scores 0.8 points higher (27.1 vs 26.3) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($2504 vs $993; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Quasar 438B (max, based on GLM-5.2) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Quasar 438B (max, based on GLM-5.2) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.3 | 27.1 | +3.0% Quasar 438B (max, bas… is 3.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $2,503.70 | +152.2% Quasar 438B (max, bas… is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 41.22s | 16.15s | −60.8% Quasar 438B (max, bas… is 60.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.60 / $1.80 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Quasar 438B (max, based on GLM-5.2) vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 3.0% more intelligence, 152.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 60.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Quasar 438B (max, based on GLM-5.2) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (medium) scores 49.70 for $2434.
Kimi K2.7 CodeQuasar 438B (max, based on GLM-5.2)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill