Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 3.6 points higher (43.0 vs 39.4) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $322; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Plus.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.0 | 39.4 | −8.4% Qwen3.7 Plus is 8.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.58 | $322.40 | −40.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 40.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 75.91s | 46.42s | −38.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 38.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 8.4% less intelligence, 40.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 38.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) scores 56.00 for $485.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) scores 53.40 for $278.
Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill