Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 21.7 points higher (43.0 vs 21.3) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $250; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.0 | 21.3 | −50.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 50.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.58 | $250.18 | −54.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 54.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 75.91s | 4.97s | −93.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 93.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 50.5% less intelligence, 54.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) scores 56.00 for $485.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill