Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 18.6 points higher (32.7 vs 14.1) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($623 vs $388; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.7 | 14.1 | −56.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 56.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $622.51 | $388.17 | −37.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 37.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.64s | 5.52s | −88.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 88.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 56.9% less intelligence, 37.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 88.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 46.20 for $219.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 46.20 for $219.
Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill