Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 16.2 points higher (26.3 vs 10.1) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $476; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.3 | 10.1 | −61.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 61.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $476.03 | −52.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 52.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 57.94s | 5.99s | −89.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 89.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 61.6% less intelligence, 52.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill